Martin was admitted as an Attorney in 1998 and appointed as Director of CK Friedlander Shandling Volks in 2001. He joined STBB as a director when the two firms merged in June 2012. Areas of expertise: Construction disputes; Commercial Litigation; Alternate Dispute Resolution; Insolvency, liquidations and insolvency enquiries; Property, Planning and Sectional Title Litigation; Admiralty and Maritime law. Martin has extensive experience in construction law litigation, including litigating on behalf of contractors, employers, and principal agents arising out of the JBCC Building Agreements, FIDIC agreement and bespoke construction law agreements; advising and appearing in construction law arbitrations and adjudications under the JBCC agreement and FIDIC agreement;Property and planning law disputes including heritage disputes, zoning, departures and title deed restriction disputes;Advising developers regarding planning law, environmental issues; Administrative law, including the Western Cape Land Use Planning Act, Spacial Planning and Land Use Management Act, City of Cape Town Municipal Planning By-Law; Advising and representing municipal entities, including but not limited to advice on the Municipal Finance Management Act and Regulations thereto, the Municipal Asset Transfer Regulations, and the Public Finance Management Act; High Court and Appeal Court litigation; and Arbitrations, both as legal counsel and sitting as arbitrator.


Living together (also known as cohabitation) as husband and wife without concluding a civil marriage, whether as a conscious or unconscious choice, occurs in the vast majority of instances without appreciating the consequences.

Take, for example, the facts in Bwanya v Master of the High Court, Cape Town and Others in the judgment handed down on 1 October 2020. B and R met in 2014 and shortly afterwards moved in together. R always treated B as his wife and to friends, their relationship at all times appeared to be that of a loving couple. R died unexpectedly in April 2016, before plans to negotiate lobola and celebrate a wedding had materialised.

B lodged claims against R’s estate, in her capacity as R’s spouse and intestate heir. The executor and Master, however, rejected the claims as B was not R’s (marital) “spouse”, as the law requires for such a claim.

In a successful application by our Cape Town litigation team, headed by Martin Bey, it was successfully argued that heterosexual partners in a permanent relationship should, for purposes of the Intestate Succession Act (“ISA”), be regarded as “spouses” and hence entitled to benefit as intestate heirs. (Our courts have before found that partners in a permanent same-sex relationship should be regarded as “spouses” for purposes of ISA.)

Mr Bey is also spearheading the related claim on behalf of B for maintenance pending the finalisation of the estate in her capacity as permanent (but unmarried) life partner.

For assistance to resolve legal disputes, contact our Litigation Team at

For the best legal advice and personalised service, let's talk
Subscribe to our monthly newsletters, subscribe