Maryna holds the BA, LLB, LLM degrees and is a Director at the Cape Town offices of STBB. She is an admitted Attorney, Notary Public and Conveyancer with many years of experience in the field of property law and conveyancing. She is also the firm's Marketing Director and attends to external publications for the firm as well as conducts ongoing training for estate agent and bankers training and is a regular seminar presenter for attorneys and property practitioners.

Property Law Update | Issue 5 – 2020

PAY OUT ON MY SIGNATURE’S SAY-SO IN THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION ERA

Global & Local Investments Advisors (Pty) Ltd v Fouché (71/2019) [2019] ZASCA 08 (18 March 2020)

This matter deals with a financial services provider that wrongly paid out client funds after it received an email, thought to be from the client, to this effect. The email appeared legitimate and the client “signed” it each time with “Regards Nick”, and other salutations to that effect. The question for determination was whether this constituted a “signature” as required in the mandate between the parties and as understood in the Electronic Transactions and Communications Act. The Court found that in these circumstances it did not. The reasoning why is important, to distinguish it from instances where similar email communications would be considered to bear the “signature” of each of the parties in the communication.

The Judgment can be viewed here.

Summary of the Judgment

COVID-19 AND SUPERVENING IMPOSSIBILITY

Much has been written in the past few weeks on the effect of unanticipated occurrences on contractual obligations to perform. Here follows a brief discussion of the principle of supervening impossibility and some of the important case law that are relevant in the context.

An overview