SHOW ME YOUR AGREEMENT WITH A THIRD PARTY
Property Master (Pty) Ltd v Redefine Properties Ltd (42983/2015)  ZAGPJHC 167
(24 June 2016)
The applicant sold a property in terms of an agreement which provided that after registration and an envisaged subdivision, a portion of the property would be retransferred to it. The property was subsequently on-sold, the new agreement reflecting the applicant’s interests. But in the process of several subsequent sales and transfers of the same property, this right fell from the agreements and the applicant sought access to these agreements in terms of PAIA to formulate an envisaged claim. Is PAIA so wide as to allow this?
TENANT TO IDENTIFY PROBLEM BEFORE LANDLORD CAN FULFILL DUTY TO MAINTAIN?
Beyers v Chapelle and Others (16454/2015)  ZAGPJHC 164 (17 June 2016)
A thorny issue was raised in this matter. In essence the question was whether a landlord’s duty to maintain the leased premises meant that he was liable for the extra charges relating to a water leak although he was not made aware of the leak, the tenants indicating that it was a municipal billing error.