Maryna holds the BA, LLB, LLM degrees and is an Executive Consultant at the Cape Town branch of STBB. She is an admitted Attorney, Notary Public, Conveyancer and Insolvency Practitioner with many years of experience in the fields of property law, conveyancing and the laws relating to corporate compliance (especially in respect of the FICA and POPIA laws). Up until 2018 she was also head of the firm’s national marketing portfolio. She is a seasoned public speaker and presenter, both in person and online. She prepares text for the majority of STBB’s internal and external publications and is editor and co-writer for two pivotal publications in the South African real estate industry – the ABC of Conveyancing (JUTA) and Delport’s South African Property Law and Practice (JUTA).

Property Law Update | Issue 1 – 2020

WITHDRAWING AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER BEFORE ACCEPTANCE – AUCTION WOES

W & A Le Roux Slaghuis (Pty) Ltd and Another v Van Niekerk (A554/17) [2019] ZAGPPHC 577 (4 December 2019)

In a judgment that creates some precedent for auction sales, the Court dealt with the following questions: (i) Can an auctioneer, as agent of the seller, be held personally liable for obligations of his principal?; (ii) can the purchaser who makes an irrevocable offer withdraw this whilst it is still open for acceptance; and (iii) can an option agreement can be repudiated before it comes into existence? The questions were addressed against the scenario where the auctioneer, after accepting the buyer’s bid, accidentally sold off fixtures on the property to a subsequent bidder.

The Judgment can be viewed here:

The Judgment
Summary of the Judgment

RUNNING A BUSINESS IN CONTRAVENTION OF ZONING PROVISIONS

McKay and Others v Ursiweb (Proprietary) Ltd and Others (3510/2019) [2019] ZAFSHC 232 (5 December 2019)

What are your rights as an owner in a residential area where another owner runs a business from his property in contravention of the relevant zoning and title deed conditions? Does it matter that the culprit is not your immediate neighbour but an owner living roughly a kilometre away? And can the culprit defend himself by arguing that he is not the only one in breach and he should therefore not be ordered to stop his business activities? This judgment is a case in point and highlights the respective owners’ rights in these circumstances.

The Judgment can be viewed here:

The Judgment
Summary of the Judgment

For the best legal advice and personalised service, let's talk
Subscribe to our monthly newsletters, subscribe