Maryna holds the BA, LLB, LLM degrees and is a Director at the Cape Town branch of STBB. She is an admitted Attorney, Notary Public, Conveyancer and Insolvency Practitioner with many years of experience in the fields of property law, conveyancing and the laws relating to corporate compliance (especially in respect of the FICA and POPIA laws). Up until 2018 she was also head of the firm’s national marketing portfolio. She is a seasoned public speaker and presenter, both in person and online. She prepares text for the majority of STBB’s internal and external publications and is editor and co-writer for two pivotal publications in the South African real estate industry – the ABC of Conveyancing (JUTA) and Delport’s South African Property Law and Practice (JUTA).

Property Law Update | Issue 08 – 2021


Real Estate Business Owners of South Africa NPC and Others v Estate Agency Affairs Board and Another (3968/2021) [2021] ZAGPJHC (15 March 2021)
Persistent hitches at the Estate Agency Affairs Board with the timeous issuing of estate agents’ Fidelity Fund certificates gave rise to this urgent application. For the estate agent industry the successful outcome was a life line, as they may not practice without this certification. Apart from highlighting the challenges agents face, the Court also ordered the Board to revert with a report on its IT functions within 30 days, the latter identified as the cause for the delays.

The Judgment
Summary of the Judgment


Monteiro and Another v Diedricks (1199/2019) [2021] ZASCA 15 (2 March 2021)
X and Y have commenced legal proceedings regarding the ownership of a luxury car. When X took the vehicle to his dealer for its usual service, Y (a company) got wind of this and sent its employees to collect the car keys. Within 24 hours Y had sold the vehicle to an innocent third party. Readers of this publication will recall the many instances reported where a person who has been dispossessed of something, unlawfully, may ask a court for a mandament van spolie, a remedy which is aimed at restoring the position that was, whatever the merits, as no-one may take the law into his own hands. Will it be available in the present matter against the dealer and the director of Y, where the vehicle was sold in the meantime?

The Judgment
Summary of the Judgment

For the best legal advice and personalised service, let's talk
Subscribe to our monthly newsletters, subscribe