For many South Africans, co-owning property is often seen as a practical way to enter the property market, reduce financial pressure, or build wealth collaboratively. Whether between spouses, business partners, or family members, shared ownership can be effective. However, it is not without legal uncertainties. Critically, the ownership structure you choose, and the agreement you put in place, will ultimately determine whether co-ownership works in your favour – or to your detriment.
The co-ownership of immovable property
Under South African law, co-ownership arises where two or more persons jointly acquire immovable property together. Each co-owner holds an undivided share in the whole property, rather than a physically distinct portion.
Per this legal arrangement, co-owners are jointly responsible for the property as a whole. Accordingly, they share equal responsibility for obligations relating to the property and share in the benefits and risks associated with ownership, subject to any agreement regulating their respective shares.
How does the co-ownership of property arise?
Co-ownership may arise in a number of ways, including the following:
Via inheritance
Where more than one person inherits an undivided share in a property in terms of the will of a deceased owner, alternatively in accordance with the provisions of the Intestate Succession Act if no will exists or the will does not deal with the property.
A consequence of marriage in community of property
Spouses married in community of property share a joint estate. Under the law, neither spouse may act unilaterally in relation to immovable property without the written consent of the other. If such spouses acquire immovable property, it is registered in both of their names.
By mutual agreement
Two or more persons may agree to purchase immovable property together, either in equal undivided shares or in defined percentages. Typically, this involves pooling financial resources to pay a deposit and obtain mortgage finance. Co-ownership is often used for investment properties, but may also arise where parties jointly purchase a home, sometimes with one party effectively paying ‘rent’ to the other.
The benefits of co-ownership
Undoubtedly, co-owning property in South Africa offers numerous potential advantages for prospective purchasers:
- Combined financial resources may allow access to a wider range of properties.
- Ongoing costs such as maintenance, repairs, and renovations are shared.
- Acquisition costs, including transfer duty, transfer fees, and bond registration costs, are divided between the co-owners.
- Reduced individual financial pressure may allow for faster bond repayment or free up capital for other investments.
- A co-owner may sell their share, subject to legislative and contractual consequences.
The risks associated with co-ownership
Despite its advantages, however, the co-ownership of a significant asset, such as immovable property, also carries risks:
- Each co-owner may be held liable for the full costs of the property if another defaults.
- One co-owner’s financial difficulties may force an unwanted sale.
- An early exit from the arrangement may be costly.
- Co-ownership may affect future borrowing capacity.
- Financial strain may damage or destroy personal relationships.
- Co-owners are jointly and severally liable for the bond debt, meaning the lender may recover the full outstanding amount from any one of them in the event of default.
- Disputes may arise where a co-owner defaults on bond payments, fails to contribute to maintenance, or wishes to suddenly sell their share.
- A co-owner typically requires the consent of the other co-owners to make decisions affecting the property, such as improvements or alterations.
- Additional legal costs may be incurred in drafting a co-ownership agreement and other ancillary documents.
Safeguarding against the pitfalls of co-ownership
Without a clear understanding of the benefits, risks, and legal consequences of co-owning property in South Africa, disputes can quickly arise. One way to avoid this is by consulting a legal expert to draft a comprehensive co-ownership agreement to regulate each party’s rights and obligations in respect of the property. Accordingly, a co-ownership agreement should – at a minimum – address the following:
- The occupation of the property
- The consequences of the death or insolvency of a co-owner
- Sale of the property and any pre-emptive rights
- Default on bond or other payments
- Division of profits or losses on sale
- Responsibility for securing finance
- Unequal contributions to deposits
- Maintenance obligations
- Payment of municipal rates and taxes
- The use of the property as security for further borrowing
Remedies available to co-owners
In the event of a dispute, any co-owner may seek the division of jointly owned property. As a general rule, parties must attempt to resolve such disputes amicably before approaching the court. Where agreement cannot be reached, a co-owner may institute the common law remedy known as the actio communi dividendo.
This remedy’s underlying principle is that no co-owner is obliged to remain in a co-ownership arrangement against their will. To that end, the court has wide discretion and may order division in kind, award the property to one co-owner subject to compensation, or direct that the property be sold and the proceeds divided. Where division is not feasible, a liquidator may be appointed. In appropriate circumstances, the court may postpone division or sale.
The importance of implementing a co-ownership agreement was illustrated in Claassen v Quenstedt. In this case, the parties jointly purchased a property but did not conclude a co-ownership agreement. Following the breakdown of their long-term, romantic relationship, disputes arose regarding occupation, costs, and the division of proceeds.
In adjudicating the matter, the court held that:
- A co-owner in lawful occupation cannot be compelled to pay rent to another co-owner unless rental income is generated;
- Net sale proceeds must be divided equally in the absence of an agreement;
- Co-ownership must be distinguished from a partnership; where no partnership exists, claims prescribe after three years; and
- The litigation could have been avoided had a co-ownership agreement been concluded.
Concluding remarks
In South Africa, co-owning property can be an effective tool to facilitate property acquisition, but it requires careful planning to mitigate risk and avoid pitfalls. Crucially, prospective co-owners should obtain legal advice and regulate their relationship contractually before signing a sale agreement. Ultimately, a well-drafted agreement protects both the property investment and the relationship between the parties.
For practical legal guidance, contact our team of experienced real estate lawyers today.
This content is the property of STBB. We encourage the sharing of our content for informational purposes. However, if you wish to copy or reproduce our content on your own platform or website, please ensure that proper credit is given to STBB, along with including a link to our article.
