{"id":44222,"date":"2026-02-17T09:56:32","date_gmt":"2026-02-17T07:56:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/?p=44222"},"modified":"2026-02-17T09:58:05","modified_gmt":"2026-02-17T07:58:05","slug":"all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/","title":{"rendered":"All About Property | When deadlines matter: Deposit forfeiture and the Conventional Penalties Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

A relatively recent decision of the Johannesburg High Court provides important guidance on the enforcement of deposit forfeiture clauses in sale agreements and the limited role of the Conventional Penalties Act in relieving defaulting purchasers. Crucially, the judgment is a clear reaffirmation of contractual certainty in high-value property transactions for sellers, purchasers, estate agents, and conveyancers alike.<\/p>\n

The dispute in brief<\/strong><\/p>\n

In Von Holdt v Hill Inc<\/em><\/u><\/a>., the parties concluded an agreement for the sale of immovable property for R17.25 million. The purchaser paid R1.75 million into the estate agent\u2019s trust account, comprising a deposit of R1 725 000 as well as a voluntary overpayment of R25 000. In terms of the agreement, the purchaser was required to furnish a bank guarantee for the balance of the purchase price upon demand.<\/p>\n

A dispute emerged when the seller demanded the guarantee, first allowing 14 days for compliance, and later issuing a further notice affording the purchaser five business days to remedy its failure. The guarantee, however, was not furnished within either period. The seller accordingly cancelled the agreement and claimed entitlement to retain the deposit in terms of the contractual forfeiture provision.<\/p>\n

The purchaser resisted the forfeiture of the full deposit on two principal grounds. First, it contended that, properly interpreted, the agreement afforded it a \u2018reasonable time\u2019 to remedy its breach beyond the express five-day period. Second, and in the alternative, it invoked section 3 of the Conventional Penalties Act. Under this provision, it argued that forfeiture of the full deposit was disproportionate to the prejudice suffered by the seller.<\/p>\n

Contractual time periods and the lex commissoria<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

On an assessment of the facts, the court rejected the purchaser\u2019s interpretation of the agreement. Applying the established principles of contractual interpretation, the court read the breach clause (clause 15.1), together with the forfeiture clause (clause 15.2), and held that the contractual machinery was clear.<\/p>\n

Clause 15.1 operated as a lex commissoria<\/em>: Upon failure to remedy any breach within the stipulated period following written notice, the innocent party became entitled to cancel. Clause 15.2 regulated the consequences of cancellation, including forfeiture of the deposit.<\/p>\n

The purchaser argued that the use of the word \u2018timeously\u2019 in the forfeiture clause introduced a flexible or reasonable time standard. The court rejected this construction. Properly interpreted in context, \u2018timeously\u2019 referred back to the expressly stipulated remedy period. According to the court, to read in a generalised reasonable time standard would undermine the certainty achieved by the carefully structured notice-and-remedy regime.<\/p>\n

Once the purchaser failed to furnish the guarantee within the agreed timeframe, the seller\u2019s right to cancel arose. The cancellation was therefore lawful and did not amount to repudiation.<\/p>\n

No importation of materiality<\/strong><\/p>\n

The purchaser further contended that its breach was not material and that it could have furnished the guarantee shortly after the deadline. The court rejected both arguments.<\/p>\n

Where parties have stipulated a lex commissoria<\/em> entitling cancellation upon failure to remedy a breach within a defined period, our courts will ordinarily give effect to that agreed allocation of risk. A separate materiality enquiry does not arise where the contract expressly provides that failure to remedy \u2018any\u2019 breach within the stipulated period entitles cancellation. Nor will a court rewrite contractual deadlines based on what a party asserts it might have done had it been afforded additional time.<\/p>\n

The judgment reinforces a familiar but sometimes overlooked principle: In property transactions, obligations relating to finance and guarantees are not aspirational. They are binding time-bound undertakings, the breach of which carries legal consequences.<\/p>\n

The Conventional Penalties Act: Proportionality and prejudice<\/strong><\/p>\n

The court accepted that the purchaser was entitled to rely on section 3 of the Conventional Penalties Act in the alternative, even while disputing that it was in breach. However, that concession did not assist it on the merits.<\/p>\n

Section 3 of the Act empowers a court to reduce a contractual penalty only where it is out of proportion to the prejudice suffered by the innocent party. The prejudice enquiry is broad and equitable, extending beyond purely arithmetical loss to include every interest affected by the breach.<\/p>\n

On the evidence, the seller demonstrated substantial prejudice. This included the collapse of an onward purchase, the loss of a prior R17 million offer, extended municipal costs, financing pressures, and the delayed realisation of the property in a deteriorating market. Although the property was subsequently resold for R15.5 million, that resale did not neutralise the prejudice arising from the failed transaction.<\/p>\n

The court did not undertake a mechanical comparison of loss and penalty. Rather, it concluded that the seller\u2019s overall prejudice exceeded the amount of the forfeited deposit and that the penalty bore a reasonable relationship to that prejudice. It was neither harsh nor unconscionable. In those circumstances, the jurisdictional threshold for reduction under section 3 was not met.<\/p>\n

Implications for property professionals<\/strong><\/p>\n

For estate agents and conveyancers, the message is clear. Deposit forfeiture clauses remain enforceable according to their terms. As such, courts will not lightly intervene to relieve purchasers from the consequences of failing to secure finance within agreed timeframes.<\/p>\n

The decision also highlights the seriousness of deposits held in trust. Once a seller becomes contractually entitled to a deposit following lawful cancellation, those funds represent a substantive contractual entitlement.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, the judgment affirms the continued vitality of the Roman-Dutch law principle of pacta sunt servanda<\/em> in the context of property transactions. The Conventional Penalties Act is not a mechanism for escaping self-created risk or an unfavourable bargain. Instead, it is designed to prevent penalties that are disproportionate to the prejudice suffered.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re navigating a similar property dispute or require considerate legal guidance, contact our expansive team of property law experts<\/u><\/a> to organise an in-person or Zoom consultation.<\/p>\n

This content is the property of STBB. We encourage the sharing of our content for informational purposes. However, if you wish to copy or reproduce our content on your own platform or website, please ensure that proper credit is given to STBB, along with including a link to our article<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A relatively recent decision of the Johannesburg High Court provides important guidance on the enforcement of deposit forfeiture clauses in sale agreements and the limited role of the Conventional Penalties Act in relieving defaulting purchasers. Crucially, the judgment is a<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":364,"featured_media":44223,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[192,98,93,137],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44222","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-all-about-property","category-articles-published-litigation-and-dispute-resolution","category-articles-published-property-law-and-conveyancing","category-latest"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAll About Property | When deadlines matter: Deposit forfeiture and the Conventional Penalties Act - STBB<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Samantha Smith\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Samantha Smith\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/39cb442bd013a183d4683b0b32944575\"},\"headline\":\"All About Property | When deadlines matter: Deposit forfeiture and the Conventional Penalties Act\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-17T07:56:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-17T07:58:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1005,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/STBB_AAP_February_2026_s5.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"All About Property\",\"Articles Published - Litigation and Dispute Resolution\",\"Articles Published - Property Law and Conveyancing\",\"Latest\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-ZA\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/\",\"name\":\"All About Property | When deadlines matter: Deposit forfeiture and the Conventional Penalties Act - STBB\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/STBB_AAP_February_2026_s5.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-17T07:56:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-17T07:58:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-ZA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-ZA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/STBB_AAP_February_2026_s5.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/STBB_AAP_February_2026_s5.png\",\"width\":660,\"height\":230,\"caption\":\"Deposit forfeiture penalty\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All About Property\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/category\\\/all-about-property\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"All About Property | When deadlines matter: Deposit forfeiture and the Conventional Penalties Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/\",\"name\":\"STBB\",\"description\":\"Welcome to STBB - We deal with every legal matter\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-ZA\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"STBB\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-ZA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/STBB_logo_2025.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/STBB_logo_2025.png\",\"width\":218,\"height\":66,\"caption\":\"STBB\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/thebigsmallfirm\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/39cb442bd013a183d4683b0b32944575\",\"name\":\"Samantha Smith\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-ZA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/95223fcb0c3132b21437c6f384ad7953278d2ba0c71ecfb12fb69f0fc1188be3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/95223fcb0c3132b21437c6f384ad7953278d2ba0c71ecfb12fb69f0fc1188be3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/95223fcb0c3132b21437c6f384ad7953278d2ba0c71ecfb12fb69f0fc1188be3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Samantha Smith\"},\"description\":\"Dr Samantha Smith holds a BSocSci, LLB, LLM, and PhD (Law) from UCT.\u00a0 She strategises, plans, and produces STBB\u2019s content across all channels and platforms and works on corporate and marketing collateral.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/stbb.co.za\\\/dev2\\\/author\\\/samanthasstbb-co-za\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All About Property | When deadlines matter: Deposit forfeiture and the Conventional Penalties Act - STBB","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Samantha Smith","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/"},"author":{"name":"Samantha Smith","@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/#\/schema\/person\/39cb442bd013a183d4683b0b32944575"},"headline":"All About Property | When deadlines matter: Deposit forfeiture and the Conventional Penalties Act","datePublished":"2026-02-17T07:56:32+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-17T07:58:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/"},"wordCount":1005,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/STBB_AAP_February_2026_s5.png","articleSection":["All About Property","Articles Published - Litigation and Dispute Resolution","Articles Published - Property Law and Conveyancing","Latest"],"inLanguage":"en-ZA"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/","url":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/","name":"All About Property | When deadlines matter: Deposit forfeiture and the Conventional Penalties Act - STBB","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/STBB_AAP_February_2026_s5.png","datePublished":"2026-02-17T07:56:32+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-17T07:58:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-ZA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-ZA","@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/STBB_AAP_February_2026_s5.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/STBB_AAP_February_2026_s5.png","width":660,"height":230,"caption":"Deposit forfeiture penalty"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/all-about-property-when-deadlines-matter-deposit-forfeiture-and-the-conventional-penalties-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All About Property","item":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/category\/all-about-property\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"All About Property | When deadlines matter: Deposit forfeiture and the Conventional Penalties Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/#website","url":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/","name":"STBB","description":"Welcome to STBB - We deal with every legal matter","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-ZA"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/#organization","name":"STBB","url":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-ZA","@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/STBB_logo_2025.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/STBB_logo_2025.png","width":218,"height":66,"caption":"STBB"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/thebigsmallfirm"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/#\/schema\/person\/39cb442bd013a183d4683b0b32944575","name":"Samantha Smith","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-ZA","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/95223fcb0c3132b21437c6f384ad7953278d2ba0c71ecfb12fb69f0fc1188be3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/95223fcb0c3132b21437c6f384ad7953278d2ba0c71ecfb12fb69f0fc1188be3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/95223fcb0c3132b21437c6f384ad7953278d2ba0c71ecfb12fb69f0fc1188be3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Samantha Smith"},"description":"Dr Samantha Smith holds a BSocSci, LLB, LLM, and PhD (Law) from UCT.\u00a0 She strategises, plans, and produces STBB\u2019s content across all channels and platforms and works on corporate and marketing collateral.","url":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/author\/samanthasstbb-co-za\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/STBB_AAP_February_2026_s5.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44222","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/364"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44222"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44222\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44225,"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44222\/revisions\/44225"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/44223"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stbb.co.za\/dev2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}